TIGER MOUNTAIN.
The operating system for enterprise value
One model, from the data room to the exit.
Massif  ·  compare → decide → plan → track
Confidential
August 2026 · v1.0

We build one AI-native graph of the enterprise estate, and run decision lenses on top of it.

Systems, dependencies, capabilities, controls and costs as a single model. The first lens, live today, is value creation: compare the estate to a reference, decide the fate of every piece, sequence the work by the cost of waiting, and track projected against realized. Every dollar of freed cash traces back to the specific move that captures it.

compare  →  decide  →  plan  →  track

The problem — value leaks at the seams

Enterprises and their investors make nine-figure decisions about their technology estate on stale spreadsheets and consultant slideware. In M&A the cost is highest and the data is worst. Origination, diligence, close, integration and exit are each run by a different team, in a different tool, on a different spreadsheet. Diligence findings evaporate at close. The synergy case nobody is later held to. The 100-day plan reinvented from scratch.

67%
of modeled cost
synergies realized
34%
of modeled revenue
synergies realized
Not because the work inside each phase is bad. Because the model does not survive the handoff between phases.
KPMG 2025 M&A Integration Survey · 350 integration leaders

Why now

  • The technology cleared. Reasoning over incomplete, inconsistent, badly-labelled enterprise data was impossible in 2021 and is routine in 2026. That was the blocker on every prior attempt at this category, and it is gone.
  • The money moved to operations. $2.5T+ of global private-equity dry powder is waiting. H1 2026 closed 67% fewer PE transactions at roughly 10% higher aggregate value — fewer, larger, higher-conviction deals, each carrying more underwriting weight than two years ago.
  • The buyers have mandates. PE value-creation teams, CIOs under cost pressure and integration offices are all being asked to show the number, not the narrative.
Sources: BDO 2026 PE Predictions · FTI Consulting · PwC US PE Deals 2026 Midyear Outlook

The moat — one engine, two scoreboards, and no handoffs

Corporate transformation and private-equity value creation look like two disciplines. They are not — they run the same work; only the terminal objective differs, synergy and accretion to the parent for the enterprise and IRR and MOIC for the fund. One codebase, two markets, no fork.

Diligence is the first draft of the plan. The work done to justify the price becomes the plan to realize it — nothing is rebuilt at close, and the pre-close synergy case becomes the post-close accountability baseline. The lifecycle is symmetric: at exit, vendor due diligence is the same engine run outward. One model carries from the data room, through Day 1, to the exit.

A competitor stitches together a screening tool, a diligence data room and a PMI tracker, and the value dies in the handoffs. We remove the handoffs: the diligence model, the integration plan and the scoreboard are the same object.

What is working, and what is designed

TierWhat it meansUse cases
WorkingDemonstrated end to end on a real industry reference model Capability analysis · onboarding · estate rationalization — risk-aware, prioritized, costed
Engine readyShared machinery built and tested; needs the specific reference wired in Compliance alignment · M&A synergy mapping · PMI planning
DesignedRequirements captured in depth; built on the same engine next Platform roll-up · deal screening & pipeline · due diligence · PE value creation & exit

The expensive, risky core is built and proven. Most of the roadmap is reach, not invention.

Traction

  • Live. Production engine working end to end on a real industry reference model; real output on a live enterprise fixture — $560K/yr realizable run-rate saving on a single mid-size estate, each dollar traced to a named system disposition.
  • Live. Production infrastructure, not a prototype: GitOps-managed Kubernetes estate, federated MCP gateway with gated auth and semantic tool discovery.
  • In flight. Design partners in conversation; services engagements funding the build with zero dilution; hyperscaler co-sell motion built and anchor target selected.
  • Pipeline. Warm named accounts across regulated Fortune 500 estates and PE portfolios.

Business model — land adopt expand

Land

Onboarding

One-time. Discovery, source mapping, connector configuration, secure tenant stand-up.

$150K–$500K
Adopt

Platform + managed

Recurring ARR. Module subscription by scope under management, plus a managed wrap.

$250K–$2M+ / yr
Expand

Value-add consulting

Project work delivered on the platform. Priced to outcome, not to hours.

$100K–$1M+

Connectors built once during onboarding are reused by every subsequent lens — the second lens costs the customer less and earns us more. Typical ranges, scoped per engagement.

Why us

Alison Andrews Reyes — CEO. 25+ years across operator, investor and technical leadership. Two director roles at Google Cloud, where she built an agentic AI platform to 2,000 weekly active users, a 20× efficiency improvement and billions in pipeline. Five patents — four in agentic cloud systems, one in threat intelligence. GP at 1843 Capital: 38% IRR, 6.6× multiple, $200M+ raised. Operator through three exits — Vigilant/Deloitte, e-Security/Novell, eGrail/FileNet. Dartmouth, BA Engineering Sciences.

Greg Felice — CTO. Built the Massif engine and runs the production estate it lives on. At Google, scaled the methods enterprises use to analyze ROI on strategic technology investment and optimize IT TCO — Massif is that method, productized. Managing Partner and CTO at Pipeline Strategy Partners, doing IT due diligence and post-merger integration for Fortune 100 executives at JPMorgan Chase, Disney and Deutsche Bank. Enterprise transformation in the Office of the CTO at The New York Times; EIT strategy at Altice USA. Earlier, Ernst & Young.

One founder has sat on all three sides of this transaction — operator, investor, and the platform leader who built the AI. The other does technology diligence and post-merger integration for a living, and built the engine to do his own job better.

The ask

We are already generating revenue and choosing when to add fuel. Raising a $3–4M seed to widen the reference library, deepen the financial models, build the live ingestion layer, productize the interface, add the risk and resilience lens, and convert two to three design partners into product ARR — the flip from services-majority to product-majority revenue.